Pure Water distiller
Enviro-Test Laboratories
A division of ETL Chemspec Anylitical Ltd.Precision Polar Bear Water Distiller







An Evaluation Of Precision Water Distillers Precision Pure 
Model: Pws 12-12 Distiller
For Removing Toxic Industrial
And Agricultural Contaminants

Testing Date June 19th,2000




Note: The Sensitivity of testing equiptment has improved over the years.  Make sure you find out the date the test was done, of any test you might compare this to. Something that might show up as undetectable in tests done 10 years ago, is now able to be detected with more sensitive equiptment.

BEWARE of  'doctored'  test results.  We have hard copy results available directly from the test labs to verify these water distiller claims.  We know of claims being made on web sites that are 100% false. Also some web sites post certifications for their water distiller, which they don't have.  Call us, we can supply you with proof about false claims others make before you get burnt.
INTRODUCTION:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness with which Precision Water Systems – Precision Pure Model: PWS 12-12 water distiller distillation system removes harmful contaminants from water.

The contaminants used in this study were selected to be representative of human pathogens found in natural waters and industrial chemicals, including pesticides. 

Pathogens were Giardia lambia, Cryptosporidia, and coliform bacteria (fecal and total). 

Chemical classes represented include: pesticides, phenolic industrial pollutants, volatile industrial pollutants, semi-volatile base/neutral industrial pollutants, trace elements, major ions and nutrients, radio nucleotides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs).

METHODS:

The PrecisionPure Model: PWS 12-12 water distiller  unit was chosen for this evaluation. 

This unit has the highest rate of distillation and therefore represents the worst case scenario for removal of contaminants.

Other Precision Water System distillers should perform as well as or better than the PWS  12-12 Water Distiller.  (Note: Some companies mislead people by not even telling what model water distiller was tested)
 

RESULTS:

Table 1. Removal efficiencies and concentrations of pathogens in raw and finished waters.


Pathogen Conc. Raw Water Finished Water Removal
Units Efficiency(%)
Cryptosporidia (cysts/10L) 3000
<1
>99.97
Giardia lambia  (cysts/10L) 3000 <1 >99.97
Total Coliforms (cfu/100 mL) >1000 <1 >99.99
Fecal Coliforms  (cfu/100 mL) >1000 <1 >99.99

The Precision Water Systems water distiller was very effective in the removal of the pathogens tested. 

No pathogens were detected in the distilled water. Table 1 summarized these results, listing the concentrations in the initial raw water, in the finished water and removal efficiencies.

TABLE 2 Removal efficiencies and concentrats of trace elements in raw and finished waters.


Trace Element
Raw Water
(mg/L)
Finished Water Removal
Efficiency (%)
Arsenic 0.06 <0.0004 >99
Barium .28 0.0005 >99
Boron .52 <0.002 >99
Cadmium 0.05 <0.0002 >99
Cobalt 0.06 <0.0002 >99
Iron  2.83 <0.02 >99
Lead 0.07 .0003 >99
Mercury 0.05 0.00023 >99
Nickel 0.15 <0.0015 >99
Selenium .06 <0.0004 >99
Vanadium 0.06 <0.0002 >99

Removal efficiencies and of trace metals and the radioactive nucleotide are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 shows the results for trace metals and Table 3 shows the results for the radioactive nucleotide, Radium 226. 

Of particular note in these results are the removal efficiencies of the toxic heavy metals, lead, cadmium and mercury, of the radioactive nucleotide and of arsenic. Arsenic, cadmium and radium 226 were not detected in the finished water.
(other distillers remove a couple percentages less lead from our observations)
 


Table 3 Removal efficiencies and concentrations (measured as radioactivity) of radio nucleotides in raw and finished waters.
TABLE 3


Radio Nucleotide
Raw Water
(Bq/L)
Finished Water
Removal
Efficiency (%)
226Radium
3.40
<0.005
>99

Table 4 Removal efficiencies and concentrations of nutrients and common anions in raw and finished waters.

TABLE 4


Anions and Nutrients Raw Water
(mg/L)
Finished Water Removal
Efficiency (%)
Chloride 11.0 0.110 99
Nitrate (as Nigrogen) 6.40 0.060 >99
Ammonia (as Nitrogen) 1.00 <0.005 >99

The water distiller effectively removed 99% or more of the chloride, nitrate and ammonia in the raw water.

No fluoride and phosphate were detected in the finished water but high detection limits for these parameters only limit the demonstration of removal efficiencies greater than 90% in this study. It should be possible to achieve demonstrated removal efficiencies of greater than 99% with lower detection limits.


Table 5 summarizes the results achieved for a selection of herbicides and insecticides. This study focused on the herbicides commonly used in Western Canada. Removal efficiencies of 99% or more were achieved for all but one of the compounds tested. The removal efficiency for Trifluralin was 98%.

TABLE 5
Removal Efficiency for Insecticides and Herbicides


Analyte Raw Water
(Mg/L)
Finished Water Removal
Efficiency (%)
Trifluralin 0.29 0.006 >98
MCPA .50 0.0002 >99
y-BHC (Lindane) 0.59 0.0023 >99
Dicamba 0.063 0.0001 >99
2,4-D 0.48 <0.0001 >99
Bromoxynil 0.38 0.0006 >99
Triallatel 0.47 0.005 99

 


 
The Precision Water Systems – Precision Pure Model: PWS 12-12 water distillation system was also evaluated with compounds selected from priority pollutant lists of the US-EPA and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment. These are toxic compounds associated with industrial activities. They are divided into three broad classes:
Volatile Priority Pollutants:

These are toxic compounds which readily evaporate and include most common solvents. Most are chlorinated and/or aromatic in nature. This class of chemical are an excellent test of the water distillation system because of the inherent difficulty of removing these chemicals from water by distillation.
 

The results obtained are summarized in Table 6. The water distiller effectively removed all of the volatile chemicals tested. Only chloroethane, the most volatile of the chemicals tested was removed with less than 99% efficiency.
TABLE 6
Removal Efficiency for Insecticides and Herbicides


Volatile Priority Pollutant
Raw Water
Finished Water
Removal
Efficiency (%)
Benzene
1.12
<0.01
>99
Bromoform
1.50
0.005
>99
Carbon tetrachloride
0.64
0.001
>99
Chlorobenzene
0.44
<0.001
>99
Chloroform
0.75
<0.005
>99
Chloromethane
0.66
<0.001
>99
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.68
<0.001
>99
1,1-Dichlorethane
0.54
0.004
>99
1,2-Dichloethane
0.66
0.01
99
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.48
<0.001
>99
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.70
<0.020
>99
Tetrachloroethene
0.70
<0.001
>99
Toluene
3.95
<0.001
>99
Trichloroethene
0.91
<0.001
>99
p-Xylene
0.35
<0.001
>99
MTBE
0.86
0.0023
>99

 

Phenolic Priority Pollutants:

These are toxic organic chemicals that include the phenol functional group. They are more soluble than other organic compounds and distribute quickly in aqueous systems. The results obtained for these compounds are summarized in Table 7. 

Of the chemicals tested, only2-chlorophenol and 3-chlorophenol were found in the finished water, and at very low, trace concentrations.  None of the more toxic, polychlorinated phenols were deteected in the finished water from the water distiller.

TABLE 7
Removal efficiencies and concentration of phenolic priority pollutants in raw and finished waters


Phenolic Priority Pollutant Raw Water Finished Water Removal
Efficiency(%)
4-Chloro-3-methylpheno 0.48 <0.001 >99
2-Chlorophenol 1.10 0.002 >99
3-Chorophenol 0.92 0.001 >99
2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.66 <0.001 >99
2-Nitrophenol 0.57 <0.002 >99
Pentachlorophenol 0.37  <0.005 >99
Phenol 0.23  <0.001 >99
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.35 <0.001 >99
Base/Neutral Priority Pollutants

These are less volatile, less soluble toxic compounds associated with industrial wastes. They are more stable and persistent than the other priority pollutants discussed above. The results achieved with a selection of these chemicals are summarized in Table 8. Removal of these compound with the water distillation system was very effective.

TABLE 8
Removal efficiencies and concentrations of base/neutral priority pollutants in raw and finished waters.
Base/Neutral
Priority Pollutant
Raw Water
Conc. (mg/L)
Finished Water
Conc. (mg/L)
Removal
Efficiency (%)
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 0.55 0.001 >99
bis(2-Chloroethoxy) methane 0.86 0.002 >99
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.84  <0.002 >99
Fluoranthene 0.45 0.002 >99
Hexachloroethane 0.39 <0.001 >99
Isophorone 0.85 0.002 >99
Nitrobenzene 0.73 <0.001 >99
N-nitrosodiphenylamine 0.28 <0.003 >99
Phenanthrene 0l.70 0.001 >99
Biphenyl 0.82 <0.001 >99
1-Methylnaphthalene 0.43 <0.001 >99

CONCLUSION:
The study shows that the Precision water Systems Precision Pure Model: PWS 12-12 water distillation distiller unit is a very effective water treatment system capable of removing both harmful pathogens and toxic chemicals from water. In this study all pathogens tested were eliminated. None were found in the finished water. The water distillation system also effectively removed all of the soluble inorganic and organic chemicals tested. Removal efficiencies of 99% or greater were achieved for almost all of chemicals tested.

Report #L7512i
Environmental Toxicologist
Enviro-Test Laboratories
Edmonton, Alberta
 

 
Comments in red, in various parts of this lab report on the Precision water distiller have been added by the webmaster

Distiller
DISTILLER